Standing Rock: 10 Years

Standing Rock at 10

  • Welcome to The Weekly.This week, we’re dedicating the newsletter to ICT’s coverage marking the 10th anniversary of the Standing Rock movement, a defining moment in modern Indigenous activism that united Native communities and allies from around the world. Through firsthand reflections, historical analysis, legal updates and reporting on the movement’s lasting impact, we look back at the legacy of #NoDAPL and the ways its influence continues to shape Indigenous advocacy today.
  • ‘The cavalry’s coming!’: Indigenous activism from 1492 to Standing Rock
  • Famed Indigenous activists like Leonard Peltier and Madonna Thunder Hawk and younger activists shared their thoughts with ICT about the evolution of Indigenous activism from the rise of the American Indian Movement in the 1960s to Standing Rock and beyond. READ MORE
  • How social media amplified the Standing Rock movement
  • Social media pushed Standing Rock’s message from on-the-ground efforts and communication to international awareness, redefining Indigenous narratives.READ MORE
  • Standing Rock 10 years later: ‘We still have a lot of unknowns’The fight continues on in court a decade after protests began over the controversial construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. READ MORE
  • A decade after Standing Rock, contentious segment of Dakota Access oil pipeline gets OKThe announcement brings an end to a drawn-out legal and regulatory saga stemming from the protests in 2016 and 2017, though further litigation over the pipeline is likely. READ MORE
  • Standing Rock: ‘It felt like every Indigenous person was there’Water protectors who answered the call to Standing Rock reflect on the community, courage and Indigenous solidarity that defined a historic movement.READ MORE
  • Standing Rock: ‘A sense of community’Those who gathered at Standing Rock recall a movement rooted in prayer, community and collective action that continues to shape Indigenous advocacy today.READ MORE
  • NEWSCAST: #NoDAPL Movement 10 Years LaterThe ICT Newscast for Friday, May 1, 2026, covers the 10th anniversary of Standing Rock, an MMIP advocacy group on wheels and two Pawnee artists/comedians.WATCH NOW Your support keeps Indigenous stories alive.We rely on readers like you to continue this work. When you give to ICT, you are supporting independent Indigenous journalism and helping ensure these stories are told with accuracy, care, and accountability.Donate now!
  • Facebook iconInstagram iconYouTube iconLinkedIn iconWebsite icon
  • Copyright © 2023 ICT, formerly Indian Country Today, All rights reserved. ICT is owned by IndiJ Public Media, an Arizona 501 (c)(3) public charity.
    You are receiving this email because you opted in.
    ICT555 N Central Ave Ste 500Phoenix, AZ 85004-1252
    Add us to your address book

Uranium: DO WE NEED TO DIE FOR IT OR OF IT?

Lakota Law

This administration has put two things on a fast track to destruction. The hot button war over Iran’s uranium destroys peace and prosperity. The rush to mine Black Hills uranium destroys people and the sacred. Both are based on manufactured crisis. Both bypass democratic oversight. Both are moving at the speed of executive commands because if either one slowed down long enough for the people to really weigh in, the answer would be no. 

Congress never authorized the war in Iran. They voted four times so far and failed to stop it. The Lakota people never consented to uranium extraction from treaty land. We’ve fought it for over 20 years and we’re still fighting. Today’s fresh Hell we are forced to face down: the Dewey-Burdock uranium project, 50 miles from Pine Ridge, in the aquifer above our reservation. It was just put on Trump’s emergency federal fast-track permitting dashboard with a mere thirty-day review period starting last week.

Watch my video and take action: send your message to Burgum: “Stop fast tracking mining on Native treaty lands”

The BLM’s draft Environmental Assessment that is supposed to protect the public was prepared under executive pressure to compress review timelines from years to weeks. It defers most of its analysis to a 12-year-old study. The 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty is mentioned zero times. The Programmatic Agreement resolving cultural harm to Lakota sacred sites won’t even be executed until six weeks after the comment period closes. That is not environmental review, that is a forced march.

The fast track to war bypassed Congress. The fast track to extraction bypassed the treaty. In the end, the only force that can sideline this runaway train is the consent of the governed. Here is what you can do right now:

First: Tell Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum directly. We need him to reverse the Pe’ Sla drilling permit, pull Dewey-Burdock off the fast-track program, and suspend all extractive permits on treaty lands until real consultation and a full environmental review are done. Use our existing action page. It’s fast and easy to make all three demands in one customizable letter to Burgum online here.

Second: Submit a public comment to the BLM on the Dewey-Burdock Environmental Assessment before May 14. See below for a short template message based on our assessment of the real legal failures of this review. Customize it and add your comment to the public record to make a difference when this goes to court.

Remember, the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty is the law of this land. Emergency orders don’t override it. Executive dashboards don’t override it. Your voice will have the final say. Use it.

Wopila tanka – In solidarity and struggle,
Chase Iron Eyes
Executive Director
Lakota People’s Law Project
Sacred Defense Fund

P.S. Here’s the boiled-down single paragraph template as a starting point to make your public comment submission to the BLM on Dewey-Burdock. It’s short enough for the online form field, and substantive enough to matter legally:

I oppose approval of the Dewey-Burdock Uranium ISR Plan of Operations (DOI-BLM-MT-C040-2026-0009-EA) and urge the BLM to withhold approval until a full, lawful review is completed. This draft Environmental Assessment is legally compromised on multiple grounds: it asks the public to comment before the Programmatic Agreement resolving cultural harm to Lakota sacred sites is executed, inverting the Section 106 process required by the National Historic Preservation Act; it analyzes only 4.2 acres while ignoring the 10,580-acre uranium operation those acres exist to enable, in violation of NEPA’s prohibition on project segmentation; it uses pre-existing groundwater contamination as a reason to minimize further harm to the same aquifer that flows toward Pine Ridge Reservation; and it contains no environmental justice analysis for the Native communities most at risk. The 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty, which governs the United States’ relationship to these lands, is mentioned zero times. I urge the BLM to extend the comment period, prepare a full Environmental Impact Statement, conduct meaningful government-to-government consultation with the Oglala Sioux Tribe, and withhold approval until all legal requirements are met.

Lakota Law

Lakota People’s Law Project
P.O. Box 27
Santa Fe, NM 87504
United States

Action: Save the He Sapa (Black Hills)/Protect Spearfish Canyon

Lakota Law

It’s time, once again, to protect a sensitive ecosystem in the He Sapa (Black Hills) from mining. A few days ago, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) opened its 30-day public comment period for the Ponderosa gold mining project. If completed, this abomination will create 43 drill pads, each with the potential to wreak havoc 24 hours a day in Spearfish Canyon, a peaceful creekside and scenic byway right in our backyard.

We can’t let this happen. Please help us defend our homelands by sending your message to the USFS today. The proposed drilling project, just about a mile from a tribally-controlled area frequently used for ceremony, threatens to disrupt our way of life. Ponderosa should never endanger this beautiful area, which is also a haven for outdoor recreational activities and home to thousands of animal and plant species. 

Watch our video, then please take action to stop the Poderosa gold mining project!

I can’t thank you enough for helping to protect our homelands and sacred sites. More than a thousand Lakota Law supporters like you responded to my last call to stop drilling near Pe’ Sla. I’m hoping for an even bigger response this time!

As always when sending to the Forest Service, please make sure to include your name, clearly register your objection, and state your reasons (environmental harm, preservation of peaceful recreational activities, and respect for Native ceremonial practice are good ones). In addition, on this one, please make sure you tell the USFS to conduct a thorough environmental review and create an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

We’ve only got a few weeks to weigh in and protect Spearfish Canyon! Please send your comment today. Thank you in advance on behalf of everyone who values our natural surroundings and all of us who call this beautiful region our home.

Wopila tanka — my gratitude to you for protecting our homelands!
Tokata Iron Eyes
Spokesperson & Organizer
Lakota People’s Law Project
Sacred Defense Fund

Action: Protect Pé Sla

Lakota Law

Warm greetings. Today, I share an urgent action. For many years, my family has helped lead the fight to protect Pe’ Sla, one of the most sacred places — located high in the Black Hills — to the Lakota People. In 2012, we helped make sure it returned to Indigenous care, but now it is threatened again by mining interests.

Fortunately, once again, we land defenders have the opportunity to stop the desecration of this ceremonial ground — but time is very short. May 16 — just days from now — is the deadline to tell the U.S. Forest Service it must not allow mining on this sacred ground! Please see below for the exact points to make, and I also invite you to watch my video and learn a little more about why I care so deeply about this special place.

Please watch my video, and then send your message to the Forest Service. Wopila!

Thankfully, the original May 9 deadline for comments was extended by one week — so let’s make our voices heard! We must not let the Rochford Mineral Exploratory Drilling Project tear up our sacred ground in its quest for graphite.

As our dear friends at the Black Hills Clean Water Alliance (BHCWA) have pointed out, this project is immediately adjacent to — and some proposed drill pads might encroach on — Pe’ Sla. Maps are vague, but, in their words, “by any definition, the project is too close!”

BHCWA’s research tells us that “the project would involve 18 drill pads. Exploration could contaminate water in the upper Rapid Creek watershed, with some proposed drill pads very close to streams. And there is also the potential for contamination or cross-contamination of underground water sources.”

BHCWA suggests that you include the following information when you submit your comment:

  • Your name and address
  • Why you care about this project and the Black Hills
  • The name of the project (Rochford Mineral Exploratory Drilling Project #67838)
  • Request for a 60-day extension of the “scoping” public comment period, so everyone has an opportunity to comment
  • A reason why you oppose the Rochford Mineral Exploratory Drilling Project. Use your own words, but two good ones are the potential negative environmental impacts and the disruption of traditional ceremonial practices for Lakotas
  • Tell the Forest Service to require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this project

This is an urgent request to protect sacred territory frequently used by many Lakota People for ceremonial practice. It is a pristine ecosystem and beautiful place. Please help us protect Pe’ Sla.

Wopila tanka — thank you, always, for your advocacy!
Tokata Iron Eyes
Spokesperson & Organizer
Lakota People’s Law Project
Sacred Defense Fund

Another Oil Spill: Why We Did Not Want It To Begin With

https://apnews.com/article/keystone-oil-pipeline-north-dakota-spill-36e86142566763a5464e1dd132eede56

Keystone oil pipeline shutdown could quickly lead to higher gasoline prices

By  JACK DURA and SARAH RAZA Updated 5:04 PM CST, April 8, 2025

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — The nearly 2,700-mile Keystone oil pipeline was shut down Tuesday morning after it ruptured in North Dakota, halting the flow of millions of gallons of crude oil from Canada to refineries in the U.S. and potentially leading to higher gasoline prices.

South Bow, a liquid pipeline business that manages the pipeline, said it shut down the pipeline after control center leak detection systems detected a pressure drop in the system. The company estimated that 3,500 barrels of oil were released and said the spill was confined to an agricultural field in a rural area, about 60 miles (97 kilometers) southwest of Fargo.

Good Thinking: Return it All

California land to be returned to Yurok Tribe

Rosie Clayburn is a descendant of the Yurok Tribe, which had its territory — called ‘O Rew in the Yurok language — ripped from them nearly two centuries ago.

“As the natural world became completely decimated, so did the Yurok people,” she said.

That decimation started when miners rushed in for gold, killing and displacing tens of thousands of Native Americans in California and ravaging the redwood trees for lumber.

1734393805389.png© Credit: CBSNews

“Everything was extracted that was marketable,” Clayburn said. “We’ve always had this really intricate relationship with the landscape. We’ve hunted, we’ve fished, we’ve gathered. And those are all management tools. Everything that we do has been in balance with the natural world.”

Now, generations later, 125 acres bordering Redwood National and State Parks will be handed back to the Yuroks.

The nonprofit Save the Redwoods League purchased the land in 2013 from an old timber mill, with the original goal of giving it to the National Park Service.

“As we continued conversations about the transfer of this land to the National Park Service, we began to realize that perhaps a better alternative would be to transfer the land back to the Yurok Tribe,” said Save the Redwoods League’s Paul Ringgold. “No one knows this land better. They’ve been stewarding this land since time and memorial”

Ringgold said that stewardship includes controlled burns to clear dead vegetation — a native practice once outlawed, but now recognized as essential in preventing catastrophic wildfires.

“Indigenous populations have been using fire as a management tool,” he said. “We’d like to see that kind of practice return.”

Redwoods serve as some of the largest stores of carbon on the planet. A single tree can capture up to 250 tons in its lifetime, the equivalent of removing nearly 200 cars from the road for an entire year. 

But between logging and fires, 95% of California’s redwoods have been destroyed. Over the past decade, the Yurok have been helping restore the land.

Another forgotten jewel of the ecosystem is salmon. The fish were once so plentiful, they were eaten with most meals. The Yurok word for salmon even translates to “that which we eat.” But the salmon population has dwindled to about one-quarter of what it was 20 years ago, according to a coalition of state and federal agencies.

The tribe is working to bolster the fish’s population by building a stream channel, two connected ponds and about 20 acres of floodplain.

“You have salmon who provide for humans, but they also provide for other animals,” Clayburn said. “And then when they spawn and die, they put nutrients back in the ground. And so, everything just has this, this balance and this reciprocal way.”

That balance is returning. There’s been a rebound in the salmon population and the Yuroks also recently reintroduced the California condor — a scavenger that’s important to the ecosystem — back into the wild for the first time this century.

“It tells us that our land’s healing and that our people are gonna heal,” Clayburn said.

The Yuroks will take full control of ‘O Rew in 2026 and, in a first-of-its-kind partnership, receive help managing it from the Save the Redwoods League, California State Parks and The National Park Service.

“We understand some of the mistakes we made as a federal government, and it’s a chance to begin that healing with the native tribes all across the United States,” said National Park Service Director Chuck Sams.

For Sams, the first Native American to lead the agency, the partnership is personal. 

“We’ve been writing our histories separately. There’s been the native history and then the American history. This is a chance when we’re doing co-stewardship and co-management to write history together,” he said.

Of the 431 parks managed by the National Park Service, 109 of them now have formal co-stewardship agreements with indigenous tribes, with 43 more on the way.

In addition to restoration work, plans for ‘O Rew include the creation of new trails, the construction of a traditional Yurok village and a state-of-the-art visitor center. The visitor center will display Yurok artifacts and highlight the tribe’s history and culture, with the goal of educating new visitors on the land’s history and significance from the perspective of those who have lived on it the longest.

“I really hope ‘O Rew symbolizes a coming home of the Yurok people and reconnecting with our landscape,” said Clayburn.

Targeting Non-Profits: An Energy Strategy

Lakota Law

By now, you’ve no doubt become familiar with ongoing legal battles over the Dakota Access pipeline (DAPL). You may recall that I, myself, was targeted and faced years in prison. Fortunately, all serious charges against me were dropped as I prepared to present a comprehensive necessity defense outlining why I had no choice but to resist the pipeline and its threat to my homelands, our people, and Unci Maka, our Grandmother Earth. You might remember the Standing Rock Nation’s lawsuits to prevent the pipeline, and you also recently heard from me about my testimony in the trial between North Dakota and the federal government regarding who will split the costs of over-policing our peaceful protest camps. 

Did you know that Energy Transfer, which operates the pipeline, has also targeted nonprofit organizations in the courts of law? Specifically — and preposterously — the oil company has gone after Greenpeace USA with a pair of lawsuits. Energy Transfer’s tactic is, unfortunately, increasingly popular. Extractive industry corporations seeking to suppress opposition to their exploitative projects file what’s known as a Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP). To give you another example, the lithium mine company operating at Thacker Pass is using SLAPP in an attempt to silence tribal activists, elders, and allies resisting the company’s destruction of Unci Maka and sacred sites on Paiute and Shoshone homelands.

A sign from a NoDAPL resistance camp perfectly sums up one reason why lawsuits against Greenpeace and other nonprofits are way off the mark. They discredit the Indigenous agency involved in frontline resistance movements.

Frankly, the latest lawsuit against Greenpeace is of a different magnitude — both in terms of the exorbitant amount of damages Energy Transfer is seeking and the specifics of the case. Greenpeace (and other entities resisting DAPL, including Standing Rock and other tribal nations) have evidence of clear legal violations committed by Energy Transfer in its rush to complete DAPL. Aware of the gravity of those violations and wanting to cast doubt on their veracity and rewrite the narrative, Energy Transfer has attacked Greenpeace with false allegations of defamation.
 
As Greenpeace has highlighted in this piece — which I strongly encourage you to read — none of the nine statements Energy Transfer claims as defamatory were originally made by Greenpeace. Rather, they were circulated publicly (and endorsed widely). I commend Greenpeace for hearing the call to join Native nations on the frontline of this fight and for accurately summarizing the problems with Energy Transfer’s SLAPP effort. Honestly, from our perspective, if you’re being sued for defamation by a major extractive industry corporation, you’re probably doing something right! 

Of course, Native water protectors and land defenders are all too familiar with the oil company’s modus operandi. Our ancestors witnessed similar tactics when Indian agents exerted control over their lives in the wake of the Dawes Allotment Act. More recently, my parents, aunties, and uncles remember well the FBI’s attempt to infiltrate and destroy the American Indian Movement in the 1970s. Native Peoples understand deeply that a commitment to truth telling and justice invites backlash from wealthy and powerful interests — government, corporate, or both.

It’s extra important for us to have our allies’ backs now, as all of this is occurring against a stark backdrop: not only has DAPL already leaked many times, but it continues to operate without a valid Environmental Impact Study or easement to cross under the Missouri River upstream of Standing Rock. Furthermore, in 2022, Energy Transfer was convicted of criminal charges in connection to its disastrous operation of pipelines in Pennsylvania and Ohio. In other words, it’s essentially a criminal corporation committed to shifting blame onto activists fighting for environmental justice and tribal sovereignty. That’s why we’ll keep battling and shining the light of truth. We hope that despite all spurious and costly legal attacks, Greenpeace will, too. We are all in this fight together.

Wopila tanka — thank you for protecting water and advancing environmental justice!
Chase Iron Eyes
Director and Lead Counsel
The Lakota People’s Law Project

Building a Clean Energy Future

Lakota Law

As you know, very few things matter to me — and to this organization and to the planet we all hope our future generations can continue to inhabit — as much as a just transition to clean energy. That’s why we support communities fighting on the frontlines against harmful extractive projects, like the Standing Rock Nation and the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony as they resist the Dakota Access pipeline (DAPL) and Thacker Pass lithium mine, respectively. It’s also why we continue to ally with Native-led groups promoting climate solutions which encompass Indigenous knowledge and respect tribal sovereignty.

To that end, this week I traveled to the Muscogee Nation near Tulsa, OK, to attend the second annual Tribal Energy Equity Summit. I was honored to speak at this important gathering, hosted by the Alliance for Tribal Clean Energy. It brought leaders from tribes and organizations across Turtle Island together with representatives from the federal government to share our viewpoints and advance equitable clean energy solutions. As part of my attendance, I sat down with Chéri Smith, the alliance’s president and CEO, to talk about the importance of Indigenous agency in creating a clean energy future for tribes. Please watch our short video, meet Chéri, and learn more about her organization’s mission.

Watch: I sat down with Chéri Smith, President and CEO of the Alliance for Tribal Clean Energy, to talk about the importance of Indigenous agency in creating a clean energy future for tribes.

It’s been — if you’ll pardon the pun — an energizing week! The summit afforded me a great opportunity to network with like-minded people and organizations, meet new friends, and reconnect with old ones. I was especially happy to share space with Dennis “Bumpy” Pu‘uhonua Kanahele, head of the Nation of Hawai’i, which maintains its status as a sovereign government under international law, independent of the United States. 

As our presence at the same summit that also hosted a pair of representatives from the White House indicates, this was a diverse gathering which welcomed a multitude of perspectives on how we can solve tribal energy issues in a just way and begin to remediate the climate crisis. As you know — and as exemplified by DAPL’s violation of our treaty lands, which hold so much potential for renewable energy development — those two issues are inextricably linked. I’m excited to see where we’ll go from here! 

Speaking of DAPL: many of you have reached out to us after reading about my participation in the ongoing trial to determine whether the federal government should reimburse the State of North Dakota for exorbitant costs it alleges it incurred by over-policing our peaceful NoDAPL movement in 2016 and 2017. This article and this one can provide you a bit more of my perspective. I’ll also plan to report back to you with further thoughts once we hear of a judgment. 

Wopila tanka — as always, thank you for supporting environmental justice! 
Chase Iron Eyes
Director and Lead Counsel
The Lakota People’s Law Project