Over this last weekend, as news channels and social media were inundated with tragic reports out of Gaza, Australia’s electorate voted down a key referendum of vital concern to Indigenous Peoples the world over. The referendum would have created a national advisory board to counsel parliament on Indigenous issues, but 60 percent of the Australian electorate rejected what could have been an important advancement for Indigenous representation at the highest levels of government.

The board was proposed to include Indigenous representatives from Australia’s six states and two territories. Each would have been voted in by local Indigenous community member-electors. A majority of Indigenous voters polled supported the proposal, and although the board would have “non-binding advice” on issues affecting Indigenous Australians, many saw it as a step in the right direction toward reconciliation.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney deliver a statement on the outcome of the Voice Referendum at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia October 14, 2023. AAP Image/Lukas Coch via REUTERS

The referendum, supported by the Prime Minister and Indigenous leaders, nevertheless faced opposition from both sides. Some Indigenous Australians and allies saw its goals as insufficient. Grassroots Indigenous sovereignty activists have said they want more significant reconciliation efforts, such as a formal treaty. On the conservative side of the fence, many Australians’ no votes seem to indicate they care little about following a path of truth, justice, and healing in regards to the nation’s Indigenous citizens, who comprise nearly 4 percent of the country’s population of 26 million.

Let me be clear with you: Aboriginal Peoples of Australia and Indigenous Peoples of the Americas share a collective experience of genocide and exploitation at the hands of settler-colonial interests. We both have resisted, gradually carving out a space to practice our cultures and exercise sovereignty. On Turtle Island, we at least have had the benefit of treaties (though, as you probably know, the U.S. government has never been known for honoring them). British settlers never even gave lip service to the Aboriginal Peoples of Australia, which is one reason any advancement in their status (the Australian Constitution fails to even recognize their existence) would have been welcome.

Indigenous Australians weren’t even allowed to vote until 1962, and the Australian state’s genocidal policies have repeatedly targeted them. Throughout the 1800s, they faced an onslaught of settler violence and dispossession of their homelands — a period parallel to the “manifest destiny” era here on Turtle Island. Continuing through the 1900s, Christian and white supremacist institutions such as boarding schools, missions, reservations, and corrupt child welfare systems abused Aboriginal children and families. I urge you to read more about the “Stolen Generations,” Indigenous children removed from their homes by the Australian government and other institutions in an attempt to eliminate the nation’s Indigenous population.
 
I may hail from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, but I have spent my life advocating for the rights and humanity of Indigenous Peoples on the international stage. While one failed referendum might seem insignificant when placed along the Australian state’s lengthy timeline of violence and dispossession of Indigenous Peoples, it is nevertheless a crucial marker of a settler-colonial society’s inability to take accountability and respectfully listen to Indigenous voices. I stand with my Indigenous relatives on the Australian continent, and I call on you to join me. Let’s show solidarity with all Indigenous people in their various struggles against settler-colonialism and genocide.

Wopila tanka — my gratitude to you.
Phyllis Young
Standing Rock Organizer
The Lakota People’s Law Project

On September 26, a good thing happened. In coordination with the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) and Civil Society Task Force, I spoke before the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) working group on Indigenous Rights and Self-Determination. I’m grateful for this rare opportunity to declare our sovereignty and present our case as Indigenous Peoples on a global stage. Today, I’m excited to share with you my thoughts, and I invite you to watch my short video presentation right here.

Watch my presentation: to the ICCPR working group.

The ICCPR is a major international treaty that commits signatory nations to protecting individuals’ civil and political rights. In speaking on behalf of Native treaty rights and sovereignty, I quoted the wisdom of Chief Frank Fools Crow, advocating for land back and a renewed international commitment to justice for Indigenous Peoples. 
 
Lakota Law was originally invited by the American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota, North Dakota, and Wyoming (special thanks to the ACLU’s Stephanie Amiotte) to sign on to a report presented to the UNHRC regarding threats posed to the Black Hills by mining. That report quotes my thoughts regarding innumerable sacred sites contained within the Black Hills, including Pe’ Sla, a cherished 2,022-acre mountain prairie home to buffalo that features pristine springs and ponds. I also discuss the deceitful history of the U.S. in its dealings with the Oceti Sakowin and the vital need to protect our sacred lands from extractive industry.
 
In addition to the ACLU and Lakota Law, the report, titled “Desecration and Exploitation of the Black Hills, South Dakota Indigenous Sacred Site,” has signatories from our friends and allies at the Black Hills Clean Water Alliance and Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Association. At the ICCPR working group briefing, other worldwide Indigenous sovereignty leaders — including chiefs, NGO directors, and legal operatives — joined me in providing important testimony.

The international human rights community must attend to the interests of Indigenous Peoples, particularly in the context of climate justice. In both my written and verbal statements, I emphasized the United States’ illegal seizure and ongoing occupation of the Black Hills. Our history — from the original occupation of our shores, through the Black Hills Gold Rush, to the present day — clearly demonstrates that colonizers will always prioritize taking lands and resources over respect for Indigenous knowledge and sovereignty. That’s why true and holistic justice requires the return of sacred lands to Indigenous hands. 

Wopila tanka — thank you for recognizing our sovereignty!
Chase Iron Eyes
Co-Director and Lead Counsel
The Lakota People’s Law Project